Repository logo
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Scholalry Output
  3. Publications
  4. Incentive-based demand response program with phase unbalance mitigation: A bilevel approach
 
  • Details

Incentive-based demand response program with phase unbalance mitigation: A bilevel approach

Source
Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks
Date Issued
2025-06-01
Author(s)
Tiwari, Abhishek
Jha, Bablesh K.
Pindoriya, Naran M.  
DOI
10.1016/j.segan.2025.101671
Volume
42
Abstract
This article proposes an adaptable incentive framework for an incentive-based demand response (IBDR) program. The framework is based on changes in demand from end-consumers using the bilevel approach to optimize the scheduling of flexible loads. The distribution system operator (DSO) acts as a leader with a multi-objective optimization problem. The objective is to maximize profit while minimizing network energy loss and peak load at the point of common coupling. The DSO's strategy involves changing demand-based adaptive incentive offers to enhance end-consumers participation in the DR program. Furthermore, the DSO aimed to mitigate phase unbalancing as an objective to address power quality issues caused by imbalances in phase voltage and power. Aggregators are regarded as followers in the bilevel approach, aiming to maximize incentives for mitigating the discomfort caused by scheduling flexible energy resources in the IBDR program. By utilizing Karush-Kuhn–Tucker conditions, the previously mentioned bilevel problem transformed into a single-level optimization problem. This work examined two case studies to determine the effectiveness of the proposed adaptable IBDR model. The efficacy of the proposed framework was assessed on a modified IEEE 25 bus unbalanced distribution system. The evaluation reveals that adaptive IBDR confers advantages to all participants, including DSO and end-consumers.
Unpaywall
URI
https://d8.irins.org/handle/IITG2025/28113
Subjects
Bilevel optimization | Incentive-based DR program | KKT optimality condition | Peak-to-Average Ratio | Phase unbalancing
IITGN Knowledge Repository Developed and Managed by Library

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify