CO2 flux and carbon dynamics in soil and respired CO2 in a semi-arid region of western India
Source
Soil Science Society of America Journal
ISSN
03615995
Date Issued
2025-03-01
Author(s)
Laskar, Amzad H.
Sarkar, Aharna
Mohanty, Ranjan Kumar
Agrawal, Rahul Kumar
Kumar, Sanjeev
Shivam, A.
Abstract
Soil CO<inf>2</inf> emissions surpass anthropogenic fluxes by an order of magnitude, with tropical soils exhibiting significant flux variability. We measured soil CO<inf>2</inf> flux, stable carbon isotope ratio (δ<sup>13</sup>C), and radiocarbon (<sup>14</sup>C) in soil-respired CO<inf>2</inf> as well as in soil pore space CO<inf>2</inf> (soil CO<inf>2</inf>) and soil organic carbon (SOC). The objectives were to estimate CO<inf>2</inf> flux, identify influencing factors, and trace the sources of CO<inf>2</inf> in soil pore space and surface emissions. Soil CO<inf>2</inf> concentrations ([CO<inf>2</inf>]) ranged from 13,780 to 26,300 ppmv. The surface CO<inf>2</inf> flux varied between 4.6 and 8.6 µmolCO<inf>2</inf>/m<sup>2</sup>/s. It was strongly influenced by soil moisture content. Under relatively dry summer day with soil moisture content in the range of 7.7%–9.5% by weight, the flux varied between 8.0 and 8.6 µmolCO<inf>2</inf>/m<sup>2</sup>/s. Under increased soil moisture conditions (14.3%–17.9%), CO<inf>2</inf> flux decreased to 4.6–6.6 µmolCO<inf>2</inf>/m<sup>2</sup>/s, with larger fluctuations attributed to moisture variability. The <sup>14</sup>C in soil and respired CO<inf>2</inf> is predominantly modern, while SOC exhibited much older radiocarbon ages, ranging from 2700 before present (BP) at 10 cm to 12,900 BP at 150-cm depth. Therefore, the SOC contributes minimally (at most 5%) to both soil and respired CO<inf>2</inf>. Instead, root respiration and the decomposition of fresh organic matter are the dominant sources, even at deeper soil layers. As a result, the SOC pool and soil CO<inf>2</inf> appear to function as largely decoupled systems, suggesting that estimating the mean residence time of SOC based solely on surface CO<inf>2</inf> flux may be misleading.
