Rani, AnkuAnkuRaniTonmoy, S. M. Towhidul IslamS. M. Towhidul IslamTonmoyDalal, DwipDwipDalalGautam, ShreyaShreyaGautamChakraborty, MeghaMeghaChakrabortyChadha, AmanAmanChadhaSheth, AmitAmitShethDas, AmitavaAmitavaDas2025-08-282025-08-282023-05-01http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04329https://d8.irins.org/handle/IITG2025/20221Automatic fact verification has received significant attention recently. Contemporary automatic fact-checking systems focus on estimating truthfulness using numerical scores which are not human-interpretable. A human fact-checker generally follows several logical steps to verify a verisimilitude claim and conclude whether it is truthful or a mere masquerade. Popular fact-checking websites follow a common structure for fact categorization such as half true, half false, false, pants on fire, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to have an aspect-based (which part is true and which part is false) explainable system that can assist human fact-checkers in asking relevant questions related to a fact, which can then be validated separately to reach a final verdict. In this paper, we propose a 5W framework (who, what, when, where, and why) for question-answer-based fact explainability. To that end, we have gathered a semi-automatically generated dataset called FACTIFY-5WQA, which consists of 395, 019 facts along with relevant 5W QAs underscoring our major contribution to this paper. A semantic role labeling system has been utilized to locate 5Ws, which generates QA pairs for claims using a masked language model. Finally, we report a baseline QA system to automatically locate those answers from evidence documents, which can be served as the baseline for future research in this field. Lastly, we propose a robust fact verification system that takes paraphrased claims and automatically validates them. The dataset and the baseline model are available at this https URL.en-USAutomatic fact verificationFACTIFY-5WQASemantic role labeling systemQA pairsHuman fact-checkere-Printe-Print123456789/595