Repository logo
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Scholalry Output
  3. Publications
  4. Quantification of cooking organic aerosol in the indoor environment using aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometers
 
  • Details

Quantification of cooking organic aerosol in the indoor environment using aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometers

Source
Aerosol Science and Technology
ISSN
02786826
Date Issued
2021-01-01
Author(s)
Katz, Erin F.
Guo, Hongyu
Campuzano-Jost, Pedro
Day, Douglas A.
Brown, Wyatt L.
Boedicker, Erin
Pothier, Matson
Lunderberg, David M.
Patel, Sameer  
Patel, Kanan
Hayes, Patrick L.
Avery, Anita
Hildebrandt Ruiz, Lea
Goldstein, Allen H.
Vance, Marina E.
Farmer, Delphine K.
Jimenez, Jose L.
DeCarlo, Peter F.
DOI
10.1080/02786826.2021.1931013
Volume
55
Issue
10
Abstract
The Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) is used extensively to study the composition of non-refractory submicron aerosol composition during atmospheric field studies. During two recent studies of indoor environments, HOMEChem and ATHLETIC, the default ambient organic aerosol AMS quantification parameters resulted in a large discrepancy with co-located instruments while sampling cooking organic aerosol (COA). Instruments agreed within uncertainty estimates during all other sampling periods. Assuming a collection efficiency (CE) of unity, adjustments to the AMS relative ionization efficiency (RIE) were required to reach agreement with co-located instruments. The range of RIE<inf>COA</inf> observed (ATHLETIC: RIE<inf>COA</inf> = 4.26–4.96, HOMEChem: RIE<inf>COA</inf> = 4.70–6.50) was consistent with RIE measured in the laboratory for cooking-specific molecules. These results agree with prior AMS studies which have indicated that more oxidized outdoor ambient organic aerosol has a relatively constant RIE of 1.4 ± 0.3 while more reduced organics have higher RIE. The applicability of a higher RIE was considered for two ambient datasets, and agreement between the AMS and co-located instruments improved when an increased response factor (RIE (Formula presented.) CE) was applied to positive matrix factorization-derived primary organic aerosol (POA). Based on the observations presented here and the literature, we recommend AMS users consider applying RIE<inf>COA</inf> =4.2 to source and indoor studies of COA and evaluate a higher POA response factor of the order of ∼1.5 in outdoor studies at urban background sites, and ∼2 at sites impacted by fresh sources. This study aims to improve AMS quantification methodology for reduced POA and highlights the importance of careful intercomparisons in field studies.
Publication link
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02786826.2021.1931013?needAccess=true
URI
https://d8.irins.org/handle/IITG2025/25655
Subjects
Jim Smith
IITGN Knowledge Repository Developed and Managed by Library

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify